Comments on: Choosing hosting for WordPress http://www.radupoenaru.com/choosing-hosting-for-wordpress/ Team leader and Software engineer Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:46:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: admin http://www.radupoenaru.com/choosing-hosting-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-20 admin Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:30:21 +0000 http://www.radupoenaru.com/choosing-hosting-for-wordpress/#comment-20 Yes, I am biased to Windows server. I consider LAMP as being a truly good technology for startups. One of my biggest reasons is that when company grows it needs more and more interactivity and also integrated environments it really requires to have at least a Windows Server - please correct me if LAMP allows intra network security and sharing resources like MS Active Directory. Also the MS products are kind of good to interact with each other. It's not about a holy war supporting a software company, more like choosing the right product for the right job (and also budget). Yes, I am biased to Windows server. I consider LAMP as being a truly good technology for startups.
One of my biggest reasons is that when company grows it needs more and more interactivity and also integrated environments it really requires to have at least a Windows Server – please correct me if LAMP allows intra network security and sharing resources like MS Active Directory. Also the MS products are kind of good to interact with each other.

It’s not about a holy war supporting a software company, more like choosing the right product for the right job (and also budget).

]]> By: Daniel http://www.radupoenaru.com/choosing-hosting-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-19 Daniel Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:30:25 +0000 http://www.radupoenaru.com/choosing-hosting-for-wordpress/#comment-19 You're clearly strongly biased towards Windows Server. That't not necessary the real picture. Get your hands on MySQL and you'll see your dear SQL server will have trouble keeping up. Same for PHP vs ASP. And so on. Not to mention the price issue :p What's up with <cite>also allow using PHP/ MySQL based applications, which LAMP doesn’t do</cite>?!? LAMP is all about PHP/MySQL based applications. You’re clearly strongly biased towards Windows Server. That’t not necessary the real picture. Get your hands on MySQL and you’ll see your dear SQL server will have trouble keeping up. Same for PHP vs ASP. And so on. Not to mention the price issue :p

What’s up with also allow using PHP/ MySQL based applications, which LAMP doesn’t do?!? LAMP is all about PHP/MySQL based applications.

]]>